Knowledge Topics
- Changes in the wings for SMSFs
- What your financial planner should look like by 2024 as new standards kick in
- Court decisions a sharp reminder of SMSF trustee responsibilities
- - PODCAST: A frank discussion about the ALP dividend proposals
- Franking Credits +
- - SMSF Association submission on the implications of removing refundable franking credits
- - Labor's franking credit proposal
- - Franking Credits Inquiry Announced: Have your story heard
- Retiree self-protection: A volatility-and-downturn 'bucket'
- September 2018 +
- - Three-year SMSF audits are no 'fix-all' solution
- - PODCAST: SMSF strategies, benefits and traps you need to know
- August 2018 +
- - Guard your super
- - FPA Share the Dream 2018 Research Report
- - Examining the S in SMSF
- July 2018 +
- - The future of SMSF reporting is here
- - Fear factor investing
- - The good, bad, and potentially ugly for SMSFs
- - The growth of savings outside super
- June 2018 +
- - New contribution rules in run up to the end of financial year
- - Why SMSFs want estate-planning advice
- - SMSFs: Our 'hardest' jobs
- - Australia's SMSF Army
- May 2018 +
- - Common trustee trip-ups and how to avoid them
- - A higher standard
- - 2018 SMSF Insights Research Paper: Diversification in Self Managed Super Funds
- - Why a new financial year is often a super crunch time
- - Super money in, super money out
- - Invest in yourself as an investor
- April 2018 +
- - Opposition to the Australian Labor Party's Franking Credit Policy Letter
- - SMSF Association Policy Position: Labor’s Imputation Credit Policy
- March 2018 +
- - What an SMSF investment strategy means for non-SMSF investors
- - The popular choice for new SMSFs: A corporate trustee
- - Millions of multiple super accounts erode savings
- February 2018 +
- - Potential pension minefields
- - What's ahead for SMSFs?
- January 2018 +
- - ATO defers lodgement date of SMSFs for 2016-17 financial year
- November 2017 +
- - Realism-v-reality - working part-time as retirees | November 2017
- - Wanted: Estate-planning advice for SMSFs | November 2017
- - 'Sandwich generation' faces new challenges | November 2017
- October 2017 +
- - Super changes require rethink on estate planning | October 2017
- - Think ahead about smart retiree spending and investing | October 2017
- - Self-employed? Don't miss out on super | October 2017
- - How to make better investment decisions | October 2017
- September 2017 +
- - The simplest way to think about an ETF portfolio | September 2017
- - Investing as a couple: the power of two | September 2017
- - A real-world benchmark for SMSF performance | September 2017
- - SMSF Retirement Insights - SMSF Association & Accurium Research | September 2017
- - Concentration can be a good thing - but not in your portfolio | September 2017
- August 2017 +
- - The great Australian (retiree) dream | August 2017
- - Our 'hardest' SMSF tasks | August 2017
- - FPA Live the Dream 2017 Research Report | August 2017
- - The digital investor and the 'ostrich effect' | August 2017
- - Why currency matters to Aussie investors | August 2017
- July 2017 +
- - A lesson in good investment habits | July 2017
- - Is your SMSF retirement-ready? | July 2017
- - Getting the jump on extra super contributions | July 2017
- - Why grey mortgage debt is rising | July 2017
- - Super drawdowns: addressing a retirement myth | July 2017
- June 2017 +
- - New financial year strategies and resolutions | June 2017
- - Confused about rate announcements? Here's why they matter to investors | June 2017
- - The ATO's top five questions for retirees
- - The ATO's top five questions for high income individuals
- - Greater choice means more homework for ETF investors | June 2017
- - The ATO's top five questions for SMSF trustees
- May 2017 +
- - The right questions to ask yourself in June | May 2017
- - ETF investors hear low-cost diversification message | May 2017
- - 2017-18 Federal Budget Update - a quiet night for SMSFs
- - Characteristics of a 'desirable' investment product | May 2017
- April 2017 +
- - A vital SMSF question: A corporate trustee or individual trustees? | April 2017
- - Practical ways to control portfolio drift | April 2017
- - Why asset allocation really matters | April 2017
- March 2017 +
- February 2017 +
- - A realty check for accessing super early | March 2017
- - Your first SMSF portfolio: Don't overlook fundamentals amid super changes | March 2017
- - Dollar-cost averaging for millennial investors | March 2017
- - Almost the world's best for retirees | March 2017
- - Competition heats up for your retirement dollars | March 2017
- - Why SMSFs hold a lion's share of retiree market | March 2017
- - Jump-start your retirement savings | February 2017
- - Don't let your portfolio end up like a gym membership | January 2017
- January 2017 +
- December 2016 +
- - Why investors should heed, but not act on, market forecasts | December 2016
- - A critical time for specialist advice | December 2016
- November 2016 +
- - Older, wiser, more realistic | November 2016
- - The US election: What happens now? | November 2016
- - SMSFs show restraint in hot residential market | November 2016
- - Meet SMSFs' early and late arrivals | November 2016
- - SMSF trustees advised to ignore market uncertainty post US poll | November 2016
- - Changes to the Assets Test for Centrelink Aged Pensions from 1 January 2017
- - Myth: There is a lack of diversification in asset allocation choices
- - Myth: SMSFs are overexposed to property and are driving a housing price bubble
- - Myth: SMSFs are not regulated
- - So, you've saved for retirement: what's next? | October 2016
- - NEW RESEARCH: SMSF Association research into SMSF contribution patterns
- - Stretching retirement income | October 2016
- September 2016 +
- - 8 common mistakes you can avoid
- - The path of least resistance: ETFs or managed funds? | September 2016
- - The gymnastics of keeping your portfolio balanced | September 2016
- - ETF trailblazers | August 2016
- August 2016 +
- - SMSFs keep property exposure in check | August 2016
- - Cost Control | August 2016
- - Taking more than you need from your nest egg? | August 2016
- - A wide-angle lens on market movements | August 2016
- July 2016 +
- - NEW RESEARCH: SMSFs still on track for comfortable retirement | July 2016
- - Election highlights need to set long-term super goals | July 2016
- June 2016 +
- - SMSF End of Financial Year Checklist | June 2016
- - What will the Federal election mean for your self managed super fund? | June 2016
- - What you need to know at end of Financial year | June 2016
- May 2016
- - The tips for rolling over to a self managed super fund | May 2016
- - Alternative ways to make money in a low-rate environment | May 2016
- - SMSF's remain the 'best super option' post budget | May 2016
- - Media Release - Super changes cause for concern for SMSFs | May 2016
- - Federal Budget Advocacy Scoreboard | May 2016
- - SMSF Association Budget Update 2016-17: The most significant changes to superannuation since 2007 | May 2016
Court decisions a sharp reminder of SMSF trustee responsibilities
Published in the Australian Financial Review on 31 January 2019.
In the final moments of 2018 and early into 2019, the new standard setter for financial advisers – the Financial Adviser Standards and Ethics Authority (FASEA) – issued new educational and ethical standards for financial advisers.
These new standards have been a long time coming and many consumers and practitioners agree they are sorely needed given the poor advice practices that have been revealed. Although there are many good financial advisers who are knowledgeable, ethical and provide excellent service for clients, unfortunately this cannot be said of all.
Consumers have a right to expect the higher standard of financial advice these changes will usher in. It won't happen overnight, but it will happen.
Most importantly for consumers, and especially considering the revelations of Kenneth Hayne's royal commission, a key plank of the financial advice reforms is a new code of ethics that all advisers will have to comply with from January 1, 2020. Brook_Mitchell
Even if they have a long relationship with an adviser, it will be worthwhile asking them now what their views are on the new FASEA regime and what they will be required to do to meet the new standards.
As with all reform, there will be those who resist (there are estimates that up one-third of advisers might leave the industry) because they don't believe the changes are necessary and decide not to invest the time, effort and cost to bring themselves up to standards required by FASEA.
So consumers need to have a broad understanding of the new standards advisers will be expected to comply with. Only then will they know the right questions to ask their adviser.
What to expect
To start, all existing advisers will have to either have a bachelor's degree or equivalent by January 1, 2024. This is a substantial increase from the existing diploma level requirement. Many existing advisers who have a bachelor's degree will be required to undertake several bridging courses, including ethics and conduct, behavioral finance and financial advice law compliance.
Those advisers without a degree will have to either start an approved degree covering core financial advice subjects or undertake up to eight post-graduate courses.
Either way, by 2024 all advisers in the industry will have completed additional education to meet the new education benchmark.
FASEA's thinking is quite simple: consumers of financial advice are entitled to know they are being advised by professionals with relevant tertiary qualifications underpinning their advice.
Aside from tertiary education, all advisers will need to pass an industry exam by January 1, 2021. It will test advisers on financial advice regulations, financial advice construction and ethical and professional reasoning. The government intends this new exam requirement to set a minimum standard for all advisers delivering financial advice to consumers.
Importantly for consumers, FASEA has recognised the importance of advisers having ongoing training, with new continuing professional development (CPD) standards applying from January 1, 2019.
Industry-wide standard
Although most advisers already undertake the CPD required by their employers or professional association, the new FASEA standard will ensure all advisers meet the same standard across the industry. This will give consumers greater confidence that their adviser understands the latest industry developments, market trends, and regulatory and legislative changes.
It means advisers will be required to complete 40 hours of CPD a year to stay up to date. And advisers returning from a career break will have to develop a plan on how they can catch up with CPD missed while out of the industry.
Most importantly for consumers, and especially considering the revelations of Kenneth Hayne's royal commission, a key plank of the financial advice reforms is a new code of ethics that all advisers will have to comply with from January 1, 2020. Currently consumers don't have the protection of an industry-wide standard of ethics.
All advisers will be required to sign up to a "code monitoring body" that will monitor whether the adviser is complying with the new code of ethics. The SMSF Association is working with other associations to establish a code monitoring body this year.
Advisers entering the industry from January 1, 2019 will also need to meet new minimum education and ethics standards. New entrants will need to have completed an approved bachelor's degree, undertaken a professional year where they are mentored by an experienced adviser, pass the industry exam, meet the CPD rules and comply with the new code of ethics requirements.
By 2024, the financial advice profession will be vastly different, with consumers hopefully the beneficiary. Higher standards will have been implemented with advisers better educated and operating under a new code of ethics.